The Purpose and Practice of Making Reasoned Arguments in a Democratic Society: A Philosophical Inquiry

Authors

  • Ms. Sushmita B.A, M.A., B.Ed., UGC NET, CTET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2025.v12n6.011

Keywords:

Reasoned Arguments, Democratic Society, epistemic virtue, critical thinking, Misinformation

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the need for an argument to present itself in an ethical manner, and in doing so it must be an inclusive argument that is necessary for democratic societies to function, building upon classical traditions from Eastern and Western philosophy as well as the thoughts of thinkers like Plato, Aristotle, Śaṅkara, Dewey, and Habermas. The paper will argue that making an argument is not a contest or battle to win people over to one's ideas or group but rather arises from epistemic virtue, critical thinking, and civic engagement in a cooperative pursuit of truth and justice. Misinformation, digital polarisation, and performative politics undermine public discourse. Honesty and accountability are moral, ethical, and democratic imperatives for making arguments. Finally, this paper will address the need for sincere and responsible argumentation.

Author Biography

Ms. Sushmita, B.A, M.A., B.Ed., UGC NET, CTET

Ms. Sushmita holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Arts in English from Banaras Hindu University, Uttar Pradesh, India. She has also completed a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) from Kurukshetra University. Additionally, she is qualified in both the University Grants Commission National Eligibility Test (UGC NET) and the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET).

References

Primary Sources

Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by W. D. Ross, Oxford University Press, 1908.

———. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin, 2nd ed., Hackett Publishing, 1999.

———. Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett, Oxford University Press, 1905.

———. Rhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts, Dover Publications, 2004.

Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad. In The Principal Upanishads, translated by S. Radhakrishnan, HarperCollins India, 1994.

The Bhagavad Gita. Translated by Eknath Easwaran, Nilgiri Press, 2007.

The Bhagavad Gita. Translated by Winthrop Sargeant, State University of New York Press, 1994.

Gautama, Akṣapāda. Nyāya Sūtra. Translated by Ganganatha Jha, Motilal Banarsidass, 1919.

Jaimini. Mīmāṃsā Sūtra. Various translations available via Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute and Motilal Banarsidass.

Nagarjuna. Mūlamadhyamakakārikā: The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. Translated by Jay Garfield, Oxford University Press, 1995.

Plato. Apology. Translated by G. M. A. Grube. Plato: Five Dialogues, edited by John M. Cooper, Hackett Publishing, 2002.

———. Gorgias. Translated by Walter Hamilton, Penguin Classics, 2004.

———. The Republic. Translated by G. M. A. Grube, revised by C. D. C. Reeve, Hackett Publishing, 1992.

Śaṅkara. Brahmasūtra Bhāṣya. Translated by Swami Gambhirananda, Advaita Ashrama, 1965.

Śrīmad Bhagavad Gītā. Translated by Eknath Easwaran, Nilgiri Press, 2007.

The Upaniṣads. Translated by Patrick Olivelle, Oxford University Press, 1996.

Zhuangzi. Basic Writings. Translated by Burton Watson, Columbia University Press, 2003.

Secondary Sources

Bhattacharya, Ramakrishna. Dialogues in Indian Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary. Routledge India, 2019.

Bilimoria, Purushottama. The Indian Ethics of Dialogue and Debate. Routledge, 2015.

Clooney, Francis X. Thinking Ritually: Rediscovering the Mīmāṃsā Roots of Hindu Ethics. Brill, 2003.

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Ohio University Press, 1927.

Deutsch, Eliot. Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. University of Hawaii Press, 1969.

Frankfurt, Harry G. On Bullshit. Princeton University Press, 2005.

Franco, Eli. “The Spitzer Manuscript and the Beginnings of Buddhist Philosophy in India.” Journal of Indian Philosophy, vol. 36, no. 5–6, 2008, pp. 495–529.

Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited by Colin Gordon, translated by Colin Gordon et al., Pantheon Books, 1980.

Ganeri, Jonardon. Philosophy in Classical India: The Proper Work of Reason. Routledge, 2001.

———. The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450–1700. Oxford University Press, 2011.

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence, MIT Press, 1989.

Han, Byung-Chul. The Burnout Society. Translated by Erik Butler, Stanford University Press, 2015.

Jha, Ganganatha. The Purva Mimamsa Sutras of Jaimini. Sri Satguru Publications, 1983.

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

Kataoka, Kei. “Kumārila’s Contribution to the Development of Indian Logic.” Journal of Indian Philosophy, vol. 37, no. 3, 2009, pp. 205–230.

Matilal, Bimal Krishna. Logic, Language and Reality: Indian Philosophy and Contemporary Issues. Motilal Banarsidass, 1990.

McIntyre, Lee. Post-Truth. MIT Press, 2018.

Mohanty, J. N. Classical Indian Philosophy: An Introductory Text. Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.

Mouffe, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. Verso, 2000.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Translated by Walter Kaufmann, Vintage, 1989.

Outram, Dorinda. The Enlightenment. 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli, and Charles A. Moore, editors. A Source Book in Indian Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 1957.

Stanley, Jason. How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Sunstein, Cass R. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford University Press, 2009.

Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2000

Downloads

Published

2025-06-16

How to Cite

Sushmita. (2025). The Purpose and Practice of Making Reasoned Arguments in a Democratic Society: A Philosophical Inquiry . RESEARCH HUB International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(6), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2025.v12n6.011