Quantum Gravity and the Emergence of Spacetime

Authors

  • Prashant Bhagwanrao Bunde Research Scholar, Department of Theoretical Physics, The English High School & Junior College, Ner, Yavatmal, Maharashtra
  • Dr Namdev Pawar Research Guide, Department of Theoretical Physics, The English High School & Junior College, Ner, Yavatmal, Maharashtra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2025.v12n7.009

Keywords:

Quantum Gravity, Emergent Spacetime, Loop Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Holography, Entanglement

Abstract

The incompatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics has led to the formulation of quantum gravity, a splinter of theory that seeks to understand how to reconcile the geometric nature of one theory (gravity) with the probabilistic nature of the other (quantum mechanics). Current research on this issue has revealed an emerging consensus that spacetime is an emergent phenomenon, more than a fundamental one, and that it could have a more primitive quantum description. The paper explores the conceptual, mathematical, and philosophical bases of the emergence of spacetime in the major quantum gravity candidates, such as loop quantum gravity, string theory, holography, tensor networks, causal sets, and matrix models. The importance of how geometrical features, causal structure, and gravitational dynamics can be achieved by entanglement patterns, information constructs, or discrete algebraic systems is stressed. Such key mathematical constructions as the Wheeler DeWitt equation, spin network area operators, and Ryu Takayanagi's derived entropy expression are studied in an attempt to exemplify the formal foundations of emergence. Such unresolved issues as the reinstitution of classical spacetime, the status of time, and the experimental inaccessibility of Planck-scale phenomena are also considered in the discussion. By amalgamating different applications, the paper has made an association to the enhanced realization of how space and time may exhibit quantum origins, which represents a dramatic paradigm shift in theoretical physics.

References

Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004). Background independent quantum gravity: A status report. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 21(15), R53–R152. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/R01

Banks, T., Fischler, W., Shenker, S. H., & Susskind, L. (1997). M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture. Physical Review D, 55(8), 5112–5128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5112

Butterfield, J., & Isham, C. J. (1999). On the emergence of time in quantum gravity. In J. Butterfield (Ed.), The arguments of time (pp. 111–168). Oxford University Press.

Connes, A., & Chamseddine, A. H. (2007). The spectral action principle. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 186(3), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-0167-3

DeWitt, B. S. (1967). Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory. Physical Review, 160(5), 1113–1148. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113

Donoghue, J. F. (1994). General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections. Physical Review D, 50(6), 3874. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3874

Evenbly, G., & Vidal, G. (2011). Tensor network renormalization yields the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz. Physical Review Letters, 115(18), 180405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.180405

Henson, J. (2009). The causal set approach to quantum gravity. In D. Oriti (Ed.), Approaches to quantum gravity (pp. 393–413). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576579.018

Huggett, N., & Wüthrich, C. (2013). Emergent spacetime and empirical (in)coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.06.001

Huggett, N., & Wüthrich, C. (2013). Emergent spacetime and empirical (in)coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.06.001

Jacobson, T. (1995). Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state. Physical Review Letters, 75(7), 1260–1263. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260

Oriti, D. (2018). Levels of spacetime emergence in quantum gravity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04875. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.04875

Oriti, D. (2018). Levels of spacetime emergence in quantum gravity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04875. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.04875

Perez, A. (2013). The spin foam approach to quantum gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2013-3

Rovelli, C., & Vidotto, F. (2022). Philosophical foundations of loop quantum gravity. In C. Bambi, L. Modesto, & I. Shapira (Eds.), Handbook of quantum gravity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.06718

Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006). Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT. Physical Review Letters, 96(18), 181602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602

Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006). Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT. Physical Review Letters, 96(18), 181602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602

Smolin, L. (2006). The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Harnad/publication/225327033_Review_of_The_trouble_with_Physics_The_rise_of_string_theory_the_fall_of_a_Science_and_what_comes_next/links/0fcfd51088ccbb21a6000000/Review-of-The-trouble-with-Physics-The-rise-of-string-theory-the-fall-of-a-Science-and-what-comes-next.pdf

Smolin, L., 2006. The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Harnad/publication/225327033_Review_of_The_trouble_with_Physics_The_rise_of_string_theory_the_fall_of_a_Science_and_what_comes_next/links/0fcfd51088ccbb21a6000000/Review-of-The-trouble-with-Physics-The-rise-of-string-theory-the-fall-of-a-Science-and-what-comes-next.pdf

Strominger, A., & Vafa, C. (1996). Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Physics Letters B, 379(1-4), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0

Strominger, A., & Vafa, C. (1996). Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. Physics Letters B, 379(1–4), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0

Maldacena, J. M. (1998). The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026654312961

Surya, S. (2019). The causal set approach to quantum gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 22(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-019-0023-1

t Hooft, G., & Veltman, M. (1974). One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Section A: Physique théorique, 20(1), 69–94. https://www.numdam.org/article/AIHPA_1974__20_1_69_0.pdf

Van Raamsdonk, M. (2010). Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement. General Relativity and Gravitation, 42(10), 2323-2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-010-1034-0

Verlinde, E. (2011). On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Bunde, P. B., & Pawar, N. (2025). Quantum Gravity and the Emergence of Spacetime. RESEARCH HUB International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(7), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2025.v12n7.009