Ahimsa in Buddhist and Gandhian Ethics: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

The concept of Ahimsa, or non-violence, as expressed in Buddhist and Gandhian ethical theory is compared in this essay, emphasizing its philosophical underpinnings, ethical significance, and current applicability. In my view, Buddhist Ahimsa places a strong emphasis on developing moral intention (cetanā), mindfulness (sati), and compassion (karuṇā), positioning non-violence as a spiritual practice as well as a useful manual for lessening pain (dukkha) and promoting ethical consciousness. Gandhian ethics, on the other hand, integrates non-violence with truth (Satya), moral courage, and active participation for social justice and conflict resolution, extending Ahimsa into the social, political, and collective realm. In my view, the comparative analysis shows both similarities and differences: Gandhi operationalizes non-violence in social and political praxis, Buddhism emphasizes individual ethical development and spiritual liberation, and both traditions emphasize intention, compassion, and relational responsibility. The essay also considers Ahimsa’s ethical ramifications in modern settings, highlighting its significance for moral leadership, resolving conflicts, environmental ethics, and global citizenship. In my view, the integration of Gandhian and Buddhist perspectives offers a comprehensive framework for moral contemplation and action, fusing socially conscious nonviolence with introspective moral discipline. This study shows that Ahimsa is still a transforming concept for communal harmony, individual moral development, and the pursuit of justice in a complex, interrelated world by fusing philosophical rigor with practical application.